Carbon dating fallacy american dating statistics
Note that, contrary to a popular misconception, carbon dating is not used to date rocks at millions of years old.
Before we get into the details of how radiometric dating methods are used, we need to review some preliminary concepts from chemistry.
This can result in the appearance of Ads we do not endorse and with which we seriously disagree.
We filter these ads as we find them, but this takes time. Carbon-14 dating is the standard method used by scientists to determine the age of certain fossilized remains.
MYTH #2 Radiocarbon dating has established the date of some organic materials (e.g., some peat deposits) to be well in excess of 50,000 years, thus rendering a recent creation (6 to 10 thousand years ago) impossible.
With our focus on one particular form of radiometric dating—carbon dating—we will see that carbon dating strongly supports a young earth.
Critics of carbon dating point to these limitations, usually by pointing to the wildly inaccurate results obtained by dating very inappropriate samples, and claim that therefore carbon dating is wrong and should never be used.
The fact is, of course, that the scientists who actually use it are well aware of these limitations and make sure to work within them. Usually when they carbon date sea life or something that eats sea life, since carbon dating doesn't work on sea life or anything that eats a lot of it. Scientists know it doesn't work on sea life, so they don't use it to date sea life!
Scientists use a technique called radiometric dating to estimate the ages of rocks, fossils, and the earth.
Many people have been led to believe that radiometric dating methods have proved the earth to be billions of years old.
Search for carbon dating fallacy:
I'm certain there are times when particular readings were wrong and had to be corrected because of contamination or something. Another flaw is it doesn't work well on things that contain no carbon.